Max Verstappen's team radio mockery shows F1 penalty needs changing

verstappen, fia, video — Photo: © LAT Images

F1 Features

Verstappen's team radio mockery shows F1 penalty needs changing

The F1 champion showed exactly why five-second penalties need a rethink

Matthew Hobkinson Lead Editor

F1 Editor & Journalist

Monday 20 November 2023 20:57 Updated: 11:27

Make us your Google favorite

It took just a single corner for the overhyped Las Vegas Grand Prix to show that while Formula 1 was racing in a sparkly new venue, the sport still faced the same old problems.

Race winner Max Verstappen ran wide to push the polesitting Ferrari of Charles Leclerc off the track and into the run-off area.

Leclerc lost the lead, and although he eventually used Pirelli's medium compound tyre to its maximum to regain the position, there's no telling how much time he lost chasing down Verstappen over the subsequent laps.

Article continues under video

After dealing with the mayhem further down the order that triggered Safety Car and Virtual Safety Car slowdowns, the FIA investigated the Verstappen-Leclerc incident, ruling the Red Bull driver guilty.

Max Verstappen received a five-second time penalty for his lap one incident with Charles Leclerc in Las Vegas

The resulting five-second penalty was practically mocked over the team radio by Verstappen and his race engineer Gianpiero Lambiase, with Max asking to pass on his regards to the FIA and GP suggesting simply to extend the gap.

When a driver isn't frustrated or intimidated by picking up F1's equivalent of a yellow card, you have to wonder what the point of the penalty is.

I'd happily be driving the neighbour's Range Rover if the courts thought a £50 fine was a suitable deterrent for car theft, but I have to stick with the hatchback instead.

It's not the first time we've seen a lack of care from the top teams at what they plainly deem toothless reprimands.

The five-second penalty's lack of impact

Sergio Perez bulldozed his way past Alex Albon in Singapore earlier this year, picking up a five-second penalty, but eased to a 10-second margin over the car behind (and was 18 seconds ahead of Albon) by the chequered flag.

Both Mercedes cars avoided dropping through the order in this year's Italian GP, too.

Lewis Hamilton's messy move on Oscar Piastri at Variante della Roggia that damaged the McLaren's front wing saw a five-second penalty for the seven-time champion. Yet he still took the same P6 finish he would've had if he got by cleanly.

A five-second penalty for George Russell came after he went off-track too at the first chicane when passing Esteban Ocon.

The Red Bull of Sergio Perez and Williams of Alex Albon

Like his team-mate, Russell ended the race no worse than had he not had five seconds added to his time.

These are only a handful of examples, and I could go back over the years to find all 10 teams receiving equally pointless penalties to show how ineffective these are to those involved.

It might be the FIA's favourite toy in recent seasons, but they have so many more at their disposal, so you have to wonder whether the already-existing harsher penalties are more suitable.

Stop-go and drive-throughs are seldom spotted these days, restricted to the most heinous crimes of... erm... driving with one mirror when the on-duty race control don't meatball flag the driver.

Is it time for a re-think over the five-second time penalty?

An F1 penalty rethink

If these are the harshest punishments available, with five-second penalties turning into innocuous distractions for ruining another's race, maybe F1 should shift around the required severity to dish these out.

To clarify, I'm not suggesting the FIA shelve the five-second penalty but use it against appropriate F1 crimes.

Repeat track limit violations, for example, as contentious a subject as they are, should not see the same telling off as ramming into a competitor or performing an illegal overtake and not giving back the position.

A five-second penalty for repeatedly crossing the white line, a drive-through for an illegal overtake, and a stop-go for adversely wrecking another's race by damaging their car could be the starting point to consider.

Track limits have been a contentious issue this season

In the Vegas incident, for example, this wouldn't see Red Bull weighing up whether or not to give the position back as a strategic decision.

Instead, it'd be Verstappen knowing to let Leclerc by because he'd know that the alternative had actual consequences.

That is the fear a punishment should hold over those it intends to police, and the current system doesn't hold that power.

It's time for a rethink.

Driver	Team	Speed Lost (km/h)
HUL	Haas	46
BOR	Sauber	51
BEA	Haas	52
LAW	RB	52
NOR	McLaren	52
BOT	Sauber	52
VER	Red Bull	53
LEC	Ferrari	53
ANT	Mercedes	53
RUS	Mercedes	54
PER	Red Bull	54
PIA	McLaren	55
OCO	Alpine	56
HAD	RB	56
HAM	Ferrari	58
ALB	Williams	58
ALO	Aston Martin	60
SAI	Williams	61
GAS	Alpine	64
STR	Aston Martin	65
COL	Williams	70

Written by

Matthew Hobkinson - Lead Editor

After four years working for a Lloyd's of London insurance syndicate, lockdown gave Matt the chance to chase a career in sports journalism - he hasn't looked back. Matt has found a home here at GPFans where he can showcase the weird and wonderful world of F1 to the millions of fans around the world who are just as passionate as he is about the best sport in the world.

View full biography