Welcome to GPFans

CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY

  • NL
  • GB
  • GB
Download
×
GPFans Global app
Download the app!
Everything F1 in one place!
FIA suggest potential for "perceived bias" with permanent stewards

FIA suggest potential for "perceived bias" with permanent stewards

F1 News

4 comments

FIA suggest potential for "perceived bias" with permanent stewards

FIA suggest potential for "perceived bias" with permanent stewards
Ian Parkes & Ewan Gale

FIA race director Michael Masi has suggested a permanent stewards' panel could promote "perceived bias".

Criticism of stewarding inconsistencies has ramped up recently, especially in light of Max Verstappen's defence of Lewis Hamilton in Brazil that went unpunished.

This was in contrast to previous decisions given in Austria, in particular, with penalties handed to Lando Norris and Sergio Perez for forcing rivals off-track.

Asked if a permanent body of stewards was feasible, Masi replied: “Feasibility is one part.

"But I think you will find, and there were some wise words about those that operated under a permanent stewards' panel, that thought there was perceived bias when there was a permanent steward.

“The stewarding we have now, with the pool of four chairmen that we share, with the pool of driver stewards, the way the chairmen meet regularly, with every system we need to take a step back and remember it is the first time in a long time we are in a real championship fight between two amazing drivers, two fantastic teams.

"As a regulator, last time I saw there was no regulator in the world that is going to be popular, regardless of if you’re a referee or a regulator of any sport.

"That is part of the role that we fulfil and forms our perspective. There will always be slight differences but at the end of the day, the stewards are there to make those.”

Put to him that those slight differences are the exact point of the conversation, Masi commented: “You need to remember, though, you can’t have two exactly the same instances, as in each and every incident is different. They’ve all got slight nuances.

“Everyone tries to blanket incidents by saying they're all the same but they’re not, and I think that’s where, at times, the perceived inconsistency comes into things.

“But the analysis that goes into each and every incident is exactly that and having a look at all the circumstances of the day.”

What do you think?
PapaofGags

"Masi insists F1 racing rules have been "made clear" to drivers"

To be fair the rules are very clear, one set of rule's for Max

& one for everyone else...

6 0

Comments (4)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Log in
 

Write a comment

Comments (2)

Gravatar
Senior
PapaofGags
Gravatar
240
461
136
Feb 2021
First Poster
PapaofGags

"Masi insists F1 racing rules have been "made clear" to drivers"

To be fair the rules are very clear, one set of rule's for Max

& one for everyone else...

Gravatar
Senior
YankeeF1
Gravatar
82
212
38
Sep 2021
YankeeF1

You are totally correct

Gravatar
Amateur
olivenoire
Gravatar
1
1
0
Nov 2021
olivenoire

+1

Show all replies (2)
Gravatar
Amateur
Bwayne11
Gravatar
1
3
1
Nov 2021
Bwayne11

I disagree completely. I think there’s an inherent bias by local race stewards. For instance if a driver is from the country that they are currently racing in then it stands to reason that the local population supports that driver. The stewards are locals so there’s likely bias there. Now a steward that works for the fia then they are less likely to have dog in the fight. And there are consequences if the stewards make the obvious wrong decision if they work for the fia. Also papaofgags you are so right! He plays by his own rules and i think that’s because the fia wants a new champion and they will be dammed if a little thing like the rules get in the way. Any other driver would be penalized for those antics. And now that he knows that he’s bulletproof he’s gonna get even worse. There’s a such thing as winning the right way and he has no intention of winning clean.

Ontdek het op Google Play