Welcome to GPFans

CHOOSE YOUR COUNTRY

  • NL
  • GB
  • GB
Download
×
GPFans Global app
Download the app!
Everything F1 in one place!
Hamilton the "contrary" of a dirty driver - Wolff

Hamilton the "contrary" of a dirty driver - Wolff

F1 News

2 comments

Hamilton the "contrary" of a dirty driver - Wolff

Hamilton the "contrary" of a dirty driver - Wolff

Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff has leapt to the defence of driver Lewis Hamilton describing him as the contrary of a dirty driver following the lap one incident with Max Verstappen at the British Grand Prix.

After Hamilton made contact with title-rival Verstappen at Silverstone, opinions both in the paddock and on social media were split as to whether the Mercedes driver was to blame for his opponent's 51g crash or whether it was a racing incident.

The stewards' ruled "Car 44 [Hamilton] is judged predominantly at fault" and handed the eventual race-winner a 10-second penalty.

Despite the ruling, Wolff believes some of the accusations levelled at his driver in the immediate aftermath have been far from the truth.

“When you hear the comments about his driving and the incident, Lewis is the contrary of someone that ever drives dirty," he said. "I think he is a sportsman.

"We have not seen any big incidents with him and that is why he keeps his demeanour.

“As we saw, the incident wasn’t particularly bothering him.”

Although defending his driver, Wolff conceded that instances like this will always be viewed with an inherent bias by the teams involved.

He added: “Everybody has an opinion and that is okay. Of course, everybody, every team, will have a certain bias towards incidents like that.”

What do you think?
Frank

I accept the verdicts of Leclerc and Alonso that it was a "racing incident". They don't work for either Mercedes or Red Bull (and never have unlike Coulthard and Webber) so I think they know enough about F1 to be able to judge impartially.

1 0

Comments (2)

You must be logged in to post comments.

Log in
 

Write a comment

Comments (2)

Gravatar
Amateur
Manuel
Gravatar
2
0
4
Jul 2021
First Poster
Manuel

He should not be driving that way , he collide , no brakes ??? He is not a SIR driving . The only attenuation is that they were going very fast , 300 ... And at high speed the defence manoeuvre could not be realised . He is guilty and he can't forget it .

Gravatar
Regular
Frank
Gravatar
10
16
4
Jan 2021
Frank

I accept the verdicts of Leclerc and Alonso that it was a "racing incident". They don't work for either Mercedes or Red Bull (and never have unlike Coulthard and Webber) so I think they know enough about F1 to be able to judge impartially.

Ontdek het op Google Play