Welcome to GPFans


  • NL
  • GB
  • FR
  • ES-MX
  • GB
Mercedes avoid potential Canadian Grand Prix protest
Mercedes 2023 glimpse as Hamilton reveals Verstappen motivation - GPFans F1 Recap
Gasly reveals critical issue that shattered AlphaTauri hopes
Vettel indicates future interest in "challenging" code switch
Hamilton reveals surprising motivation after Verstappen sickener
Hungarian GP home set for renovation to tackle F1 calendar threat
F1 LIVE - Leclerc splits from long-term girlfriend
Ferrari slated as rudderless by "worried" former chief
Russell offers sneak peak of 2023 Mercedes - with new roll hoop
F1 provides extensive update on sustainability targets
Steiner issues Ferrari "bomb" threat for 2023
Ricciardo reveals Red Bull hunger mission
Grosjean embarks on new chapter with factory WEC drive
Perez issues Red Bull united warning after Verstappen friction
Sainz makes Leclerc 'copying' admission
Mercedes avoid potential Canadian Grand Prix protest

Mercedes avoid potential Canadian Grand Prix protest

F1 News

Mercedes avoid potential Canadian Grand Prix protest

Mercedes avoid potential Canadian Grand Prix protest
Ian Parkes & Ewan Gale

Mercedes has avoided the threat of a potential post-Canadian Grand Prix protest.

Alpine team principal Otmar Szafnauer had suggested Mercedes could face a protest for running an additional floor-stay on its cars this weekend.

The extra stay had been introduced to help combat the porpoising suffered by the W13, falling in line with the technical directive issued by the FIA earlier this week.

Eyebrows were raised, however, by the speed of Mercedes' solution given the TD was only introduced on Thursday when most teams had either landed or were en route to Canada.

It had left teams behind and seemingly at a disadvantage, raising questions as to whether the directive had been issued to teams equally.

Speaking in the FIA press conference on Saturday ahead of final practice, Szafnauer said: "The TD came out when our chief technical officer was flying over, so it was quite late.

"We aren't able to produce a stay here and as far as the process goes, it is a technical directive and technical directives, as we all know, aren't regulations."

Suggesting the W13 was, therefore, not compliant, Szafnauer added: "It could very well be that we shouldn't be running this in qualifying and in the race.

"If teams have brought those stays, I would imagine they could be perhaps looked at after and protested.

"It is against the regulation as it stands today but we definitely don't have one and unfortunately, if you do have an extra stay, you can run the car lower and stiffer and gain some advantage."

Mercedes, however, has since decided not to continue running a second stay as it proved ineffective when tested in practice on Friday.

Szafnauer explains why extra stay is an unfair advantage

The stay is effectively a support connecting the floor to the rest of the car at the rear-most part of the sidepod and chassis structure.

Mercedes' component was more visible as a consequence of the revealing nature of its zeropod design, with a second stay removing the need for any reinforcement of the floor itself.

Asked for a timeframe on when any additional stay could be produced, Szafnauer explained: "By the next race we would be able to do so.

"But we have chosen to stiffen the floor in that area at the expense of weight and as we all discussed, there are some cars that are still overweight.

"That is a trade-off you make between adding weight to the car so you can stiffen the floor.

"If you are just given a stay, then you don't have to add the weight and do the same job. Anyway, we couldn't do it in a day."

Ontdek het op Google Play